Kent H. Cheng, Ph.D.
Partner
Dr. Cheng has practiced intellectual property law since 1988. He has
extensive experience prosecuting and litigating patents covering
pharmaceuticals under the Hatch-Waxman Act. He has advised branded
pharmaceutical companies in preserving their competitive positions, and
U.S. and foreign generic pharmaceutical companies to assist their entry into
the U.S. market.
He also has prepared opinions on patent validity, infringement, and freedom
to operate issues in the chemical, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
devices, electronic, software and mechanical arts.
In the arena of pharmaceutical and biotechnology patent prosecution,
Dr. Cheng has represented clients in administrative proceedings in the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office including reexaminations, interferences and
appeals to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. He frequently
lectures on U.S. patent law and practice in the U.S., Europe and Asia.
Dr. Cheng has conducted audits of clients' system of procuring, maintaining
and using patents; advised clients regarding confidentiality, licensing and
employment/consultant agreements; and drafted settlement agreements and
licensing agreements among multinational companies in various
technologies. He also has advised clients in trademark and trade dress
disputes, and in the area of unfair competition.
J.D., Pace University, 1991
Ph.D., Chemistry, Brandeis University, 1979
B.A., Chemical Physics, Columbia University, 1974
New York, Connecticut
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
U.S. District Courts, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York; District of
Columbia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
New York State Bar Association
New York Intellectual Property Law Association
American Bar Association
Chinese
“Supreme Court debates critical component,” by Shanaz Mahmud, Reporter, Managing Intellectual Property with Kent Cheng, Partner
“Drafting a Patent Application that Can Withstand Litigation,” Beijing, China
In re '639 Patent Litigation 154 F. Supp. 2d 157 (D. Mass. 2001), aff''d sub. nom. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Copley Pharm., No. 01-1611, 45 Fed. Appx. 915 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2002).